Re: Alpha checkpoint

[Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>]

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 09:18 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:55 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
> >  I propose that we *do* have it as default for the Alpha and Beta and if
> > it comes to a point, similar to the F10 trials, where it's still too
> > rough, that we can simply fallback (again) to Pidgin for another
> > release. I sincerely hope that this is not the case, though. ;-)
> 
> If you're going to do that again, you're really going to need to nail
> down a set of criteria for "pass" vs "fail" so that QA et al can better
> help make that judgment call.  It was entirely too wishy washy last time
> around.

For starters, it would be nice if the people who rejected it the last
time around would log their reasons for doing so on the feature page...