I haven't looked into Fedora Core's Minimum Install yet, but RedHat's Minimum Install is _all_but_minimal_. A Minimum Install should look _almost_ like an OpenBSD default boot: No services active (BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT EVEN INSTALLED) NO X. Just the necessary to boot and make post install installations. This is what a Minimum should be. Anything more and it doesn't deserve the term Minimal Hugs, Rui ps: then you could have things like Minimum( + GROUP)* where you'd add whatever kind of service groups you'd like your machine to do. On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 15:11, Robert Marcano wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 10:49, Mako Gabor wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm Gabor from Hungary, new one in the mailing list! I'm RedHat/Fedora fan. :) > > (I didn't speak English well. :)) > > > > I have a suggest for Fedora Linux. :) > > There isn't Minimum Install option (only console with base rpm packages > > ~150MB?) and Mininum XWindow Install options in Fedora/RedHat Install. > > (There are only Workstation, Dekstop, Server, Custom options.) > > I like to use the minimal install options often. > > If I remember correctly, you can use the custom option, and on the > package selection screen yo can choose Minimum Install or Full Install, > the last two options (The last time i saw those options was using RH9, i > don't remember if Fedora still has them) > > > > > Can you implement them into the install options? > > > > Bye! > > Gabor > > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list redhat com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part