Nameing guideline for external kernel-modules in fedora(.us)

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mer 17/12/2003 à 15:51, Chris Ricker a écrit :
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 
> > So make the SMP one require the UP.
> > Frankly SMP alsa users are the minority, they'd better have an UP kernel
> > as fallback, so they can live with two alsa modules without polluting
> > normal user systems.
> 
> Why? My SMP boxes don't have a UP kernel on them.

Well, better :
- SMP users shall have SMP and UP code
than :
- everyone shall have SMP and UP code

And anyway who is going to use 2.4 alsa on smp now ?

Cheers,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031217/9d40b9ee/attachment.sig>