[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Should there be BuildRequires for perl/libtool/auto*?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: David T Hollis <dhollis davehollis com>
- Cc: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Should there be BuildRequires for perl/libtool/auto*?
- Date: 27 Dec 2003 19:11:35 -0200
On Dec 27, 2003, David T Hollis <dhollis davehollis com> wrote:
> From what I have seen, if you patch configure.in/ac or a Makefile.am,
> you should call the auto* tools from the spec file - typically in the
> build section from what I have seen.
FWIW, I find it a very bad idea to run autoreconf or somesuch in spec
files. The right way to do it, IMHO, is to bundle with the patch for
the configure.in/.ac or Makefile.am the patches for the generated
files (and maybe some additional touch statements), to make sure you
don't depend on the exact version of the auto* tools that you have
installed to be able to rebuild the package, which is how these tools
are meant to be used.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]