On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 19:02, Willem Riede wrote: > On 2003.12.31 12:24, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > While that is a good practice, is it sufficient? How do you know that the > package you just attached your reputation to (by signing with your key) > isn't going to trash or take over the system of any user that installs it? Because I trust in the fellowship that develops AbiWord and from close contact. OF COURSE it is not sufficient, please read http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ to grasp how bad it _IS_POSSIBLE_ to be. Now define a level you can live with and start reasoning from there. OF COURSE it is not sufficient, but it's one more layer that should be added and doesn't penalize efficiency. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part