[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFC: i18n proposal



On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:22:41PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Oh I could care less if it's in the headers or not ;-)
> 
> I just want it in the package somewhere, rather than having a "central
> registry" package with all the translations. Packages should be
> self-contained (well, other than dependencies, but I don't think
> "Requires: specspo = X.Y" would go over well).
> 

s/it in/it with/ and we're on the same page. Otherwise, it's time to get
the snake oil out and wrestle. Wheee!

73 de Jeff

-- 
Jeff Johnson	ARS N3NPQ
jbj redhat com (jbj jbj org)
Chapel Hill, NC




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]