[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RFC: i18n proposal
- From: "Göran Uddeborg" <goeran uddeborg se>
- To: rhl-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: RFC: i18n proposal
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:33:40 +0200
Havoc Pennington writes:
> I wouldn't do it this way. Another suggestion is to have the gettext
> hash tables in the package file list
> (/usr/share/locale/LANG/translation-domain.mo)
>
> The translation domain might be in the RPM header.
>
> Then a tool such as redhat-config-packages, if the package is
> installed simply calls bindtextdomain (/usr/share/locale) and uses the
> gettext hash in-place; if the package is not installed it sucks the
> gettext hash out of the package and puts it somewhere temporary to
> use.
I'm trying to follow this discussion, but I don't quite understand
what you suggest here. Partly I'm confused about what is variables,
and what is literal.
If we take an example: Swedish translations and coreutils. The
translations of coreutils' own messages resides in
/usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/coreutils.mo. What would be the file
name of the file containing the Swedish translation of the
%description of the RPM package coreutils? And what other
translations would that file contain?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]