Perl module rpm dependency problem
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Thu Jul 31 21:17:47 UTC 2003
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:42:41PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> If you peek at the affected files, you'll see that they actually are not
> "included" as far as rpm is concerned. rpm looks at the "package foo"
> statements when building the list of Provides, and "use/require foo" for
> Requires.
Ah yes, ok, then I shouldn't blame rpm's scripts.
> Those files do not have a package of their own, instead they blend into
> the XML::SAX::PurePerl package. And perl allows one to use() them using
> the fully qualified, "fake" package name (based on the dir structure, I
> believe).
What about packaging XML-SAX-PurePerl? Shouldn't that solve the
problem? I have to admit I don't know much about this area, but
I needed XML-SAX because it is required by XML-LibXML.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list