Le dim 02/11/2003 à 11:54, Warren Togami a écrit : > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 00:33, Stephan Windischmann wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 10:30, Didier Casse wrote: > > > But you still can get support from the Enlightenment team! I currently use > > > Enlightenment and I'm often on their mailing list. I can tell you that > > > they (and including me!) can provide full support for anybody who use > > > E desktop on any distro. I currently use RH9 and willing to help anybody > > > who has problems with E on RH9. > > Then the Enlightenment team (or any other projects team) should set up > > their own apt/yum repository for RH/Fedora. > > > > Wrong. The enlightenment team should submit their official package to > fedora QA for inclusion in the community's repository. And the QA/packaging rules part is very important. When you package in isolation your own stuff in your own repository it's altogether too easy to miss problems a larger community will have identified. > > Due to different philosophies, I doubt that Fedora iseer going to have > > repositories as big as Debian, so for a number of projects, we will have > > to rely on 3d party repositories. > > Wrong again. 3rd party repositories will only be necessary mainly for > packages that cannot exist in Fedora due to license or legal reasons. > This is very similar to Debian's situation. See jpackage for java as an example of 3rd party repository that is separate for licensing/legal reasons. (Well even if there was no licensing issues I don't think we'd merge with Fedora since it would leave our mdk members in the dust. Some form of close association/affiliation would be possible however) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=