[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: AMD 64 support
- From: "Justin M. Forbes" <64bit_fedora comcast net>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: AMD 64 support
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:29:58 -0600 (CST)
I wouldnt say that... people are working on an AMD64 fedora currently.
Justin M. Forbes
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Pete Bradbury wrote:
> So should I infer from what you are saying that the AMD 64 port is some way
> off in the distant future and that until Fedora on the '86 platform is
> stabilised work is unlikely to proceed for this new processor?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Snitzer" <msnitzer lnxi com>
> To: <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:34 PM
> Subject: Re: AMD 64 support
>
>
> > On Mon, Nov 03 2003 at 10:42,
> > seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 12:41, Pete Bradbury wrote:
> > > > Will the fedora project support the AMD 64 processor?
> > > >
> > >
> > > please read through the mailing list archives.
> >
> > Given that there has only been a handfull of references to the future of
> > fedora with regard to amd64... that's a bit cold no?
> >
> > Unless I missed a really inciteful amd64 thread: Yum has support for
> > x86_64 (as of v2.0.4?). It would appear there are a few people interested
> > in a Fedora Core port to x86_64 but there has been little formal
> > discussion on getting that ball rolling.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > fedora-devel-list redhat com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]