fedora-legacy agrees to enforce rpm upgrades? (was: Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 1)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
Fri Nov 7 16:47:17 UTC 2003


On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:27:20AM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> This however does not matter, since it has been agreed upon on
> fedora-legacy list that ALL distributions supported by Fedora Legacy
> will force an upgrade of rpm as a requirement for users to begin using
> those repositories.

When was this agreed upon?

While I personally support this scheme, I was under the impression
that there were more people against enforcing rpm upgrades for
minimally changes (e.g. fedora-legacy should only provide security
related errata). Especially because RH itself did not issue errata for
rpm despite the known problems.

In fact, Warren, I believe we were the only two supporting rpm
upgrades, so unless we are the only left subscribers of fedora-legacy,
it is not yet an agreement of the whole list. ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031107/abf920d4/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list