[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: i18n issues, was: FC2 release
- From: Paul Gampe <pgampe redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com, Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- Cc: pmmm rnl ist utl pt (Pedro Morais), sarahs redhat com (Sarah Saiying Wang)
- Subject: Re: i18n issues, was: FC2 release
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:33:46 +1000
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:49 am, Alan Cox wrote:
> Does that mean that by mid December we can be thinking about getting the
> lost translations (for non install stuff) rolling out as or with errata,
> since Fedora doesn't have the errata restrictions RHEL does ?
I may not be interpreting the question correctly Alan sorry, so do you mean
translations that have been committed for redhat-config-* but not picked up
in the rpm for the application?
I think Pedro's suggestion of specifying a date for package maintainers to
update their package is a reasonable solution, but I too have concerns about
the workload this would generate. Using cvs watch on the po/* files has been
an effective way for me to track as translations get updated, so that is one
way to know whether a rebuild is required.
Paul
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]