Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 2

[Jesse Keating]

On Friday 07 November 2003 14:49, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Here is their release numbers : 0.8 -> 0.9 -> 0.10
> How should we set the RPM fields without using epochs in this type of
> versionning ? Is is a case where epoch is necessary ?

Does rpm actually fail on this?  My understanding was that it takes the 
number after the dot as a whole, where as "8" is less than "9" which is 
less than "10".

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam           (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031107/34919820/attachment.sig>