Re: FC2 release dates

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

> So those folks, who are already in a bind with "what version do I standardize 
> on" will be basically *forced* to go with FC1 as an intermediary (since its 
> EOL will be later than RHL9's), or else use a different distro altogether, 
> which means that FC loses a "customer".
> 
> I'm in a not-too-conservative environment.  But my colleagues and I will 
> already need to update to RHL9 or FC1 before the end of December, then to FC1 
> before the end of April.  Or else depend on community-supplied security 
> updates, which still looks like a very shaky proposition (I hope it will 
> stabilize, but it's too soon to tell).

And those people should pay close attention to Fedora Legacy and try to
help themselves and others when possible.

-sv