ReiserFS in Anaconda?

[Ro]

Well I speak from inexperience, ergo, the reason I am questioning you all.
So, my wrap up of this entire thread: I currently have RH 9.0 production
Servers and since the Errata will end 'soon' for RH 9.0, I was wondering if
moving to Fedora Core 1 would be a smart move. And should I continue with
ext3 or perhaps explore other venues.... JFS perhaps. Your input is GREATLY
appreciated.

 

Cheers,

 

Ro

 

>>On Friday 07 November 2003 20:22, Ro wrote:

>> Well, we all know that ReiserFS is FAR from being in development... 

>>it's  BEEN out... So I was wondering if someone could objectively 

>>answer this  questions. I am really not trying to make anyone 

>>uncomfortable, just  curious. :-)

 

>Actually we don't know that.  A lot of work is being done on Reiser4, 

>and

>little on 3, and the author has stated that he's more concerned with 

>feature sets than stability.  Not exactly what I want to hear from my fs 

>developer.  Our company gave reiserfs a try a year or 2 back, given it's 

>merits then, and everybody was saying it was stable, blah blah.  It led to 

>a lot of our customers losing their data when reiser would puke.  We're 

>re-evaulating our file system offerings, and at this point, JFS seems to 

>be in the lead.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031108/1d50924b/attachment.htm>