On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lun 10/11/2003 à 20:33, Rui Miguel Seabra a écrit : > > I'd rather check for a backport than jump into the 2.6 world right now. > > I have absolutely no suspend: this is an acpi only laptop, and S3 does > > nothing on it. > Not to mention suspend on 2.6 is not really ready now (last time I > chacked there were three ! different implementations competing) Well, swsusp seems to be working right enough on 2.6 (yes, I dared), but I had to come back: natsemi not working == !eth == BAD BAD! > OTOH, there are loads of stuff available in 2.6 that people have been > awaiting for ages (alsa, ipsec, acls, xfs, sane cd burning, dm, udev...) > At this point fedora devel should switch to 2.6 asap to get it ready for > FC2. 2.4 enhancements seem more a job for the legacy project now. I think so. Most of the things I like on RedHat's (now Fedora's) kernel is that it has cool things backported to the stable kernel. With 2.6 they're there, but 2.6 needs heavy testing. Before I noticed I had no eth, I tested swsusp and acpi which seemed to be fine. Then I went for alsa, when I remembered I didn't have the required utils, and when I tried to fetch them DUH no net. Basically, natsemi loads, the interface gets up, but I see no packets going on with tcpdump except for me who-has'ing the net for my home gw. Hugs, Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part