Am Mo, den 17.11.2003 schrieb Dan Williams um 16:09: > Hi, Hi! > You don't :) Well, that's not completely true. > > First, the issue of missing Java. We do not build OOo with Java > enabled, because we cannot distribute a JVM with Fedora. But isn't it possible to make it user selectable like the original OO-installer does? Or just put the Java-things into another package which is not installed by default an gives a warning that it needs an installed JVM or somthing like this. I understand that it isn't possible to have a JVM in fedora but I think many people are interested in the java-facilities of OO me included. > What I'm looking at is a good way to perhaps _build_ with Java here, but > allow OOo to run on non-Java-enabled systems and Java-enabled systems at > the same time. That's not exactly easy though. But doesn't the original-installer allow you to enable the Java-Support at installation-time and not at compiletime? > > For the time being, if you'd like to use Java, I'd suggest grabbing the > SRPM and removing the "--disable-java" from the ./configure options, and > also commenting out all the "handle-no-solar-java" patches. How long does it take and how much diskspace am I needing to build an OO that way? > Dan André
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil