[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 2



On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Aurelien Bompard wrote:

>These guidelines seem fine, thanks for the work.
>
>However, I have recently bumped into a package naming problem which doesn't
>seem to be covered here. It's a program called K3B, a CD/DVD burning
>frontend for KDE.
>Here is their release numbers : 0.8 -> 0.9 -> 0.10
>How should we set the RPM fields without using epochs in this type of
>versionning ? Is is a case where epoch is necessary ?

Release: 0.8
Release: 0.9
Release: 0.10

What's the problem?


-- 
Mike A. Harris     ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]