Re: xmms release number

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

seth vidal (skvidal phy duke edu) said: 
> I think what havoc was meaning that programs that are going to be
> exposed to the user in the extras/alternatives/etc repositories should
> be listed in a comps.xml file and ideally then r-c-p could handle that
> part and list them nicely in those groups for the user.

Sure, but this is not necessarily meta-information in the package
itself. Unless you just want to create rpm groups all over again.

Bill