On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:19:08PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > A few observations: In your repository I don't see a consistent > platform specific release tag scheme. check the dates and the discussion on fedora.us in March/April (yes, I was once a fedora member). The fact is that there still is no versioning scheme one can rely upon. The scheme we discussed with fedora.us in March/April is now broken. The main issue is, that RH need to come up with a consistent scheme (not only for fedora but also including fedora legacy), or bless an existing one. Currently there is no schem that will work: o either the upgrade paths are broken, e.g. rh9 -> fc1/fdr1 o or rpm bugs are triggered, e.g. rhXX -> numbers o Red Hat policy is violated, e.g. rh9 -> rh10 I understand RH's marketing and company policy, I won't join the "free beer" group, but I would like the policy to not spoil technical issues. > > What about Fedora Legacy, should part of it be distro-tagged and > > some not (like your example above)? > > I haven't seen any work on guidelines for Fedora Legacy yet. This thread _is_ about Fedora Lagacy ... ;) -- Axel Thimm physik fu-berlin de
Attachment:
pgp00031.pgp
Description: PGP signature