Fedora and RedHat's autism toward personal users

[Wil Cooley]

On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 13:24, Derek P. Moore wrote:

> Anyways, I just don't see how the web browsers situation is any different from
> the web servers situations (or how the mail clients situation is any different
> from the mail servers situation [I definately think Fedora should provide at
> least Sendmail, Postfix, and qmail {hotmail.com wouldn't use qmail if it wasn't
> good for something}]).

Fedora cannot distribute qmail because DJB's license is too restrictive;
likewise it also fails to meet either GNU or OSI definitions of "Free"
or "Open Source".  

Wil
-- 
Wil Cooley                                 wcooley at nakedape.cc
Naked Ape Consulting                        http://nakedape.cc
* * * * * *  Linux Services for Small Businesses  * * * * * *
*       Easy, reliable solutions for small businesses       *
*    Naked Ape Business Server http://nakedape.cc/r/sms     *
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20031013/9af2ad4d/attachment.sig>