Le dim 26/10/2003 à 21:58, rhldevel assursys co uk a écrit : > On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Konstantin Riabitsev wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 12:21, Jos Vos wrote: > > > > I doubt qmail is of interest to Fedora, but what about the others? Want > > > > them passed on? > > > > > > Qmail has a non-Open Source license. > > > > Allow me to add to that. The Qmail license strictly prohibits > > distribution of modified sources, and the same goes for binaries. > > I believe that Debian works around this by distributing the equivalent of a > src.rpm that wget's the qmail source as part of the build process. Then just redistribute a src.rpm or even a nosrc.rpm only. Automated remote download during build process is plain ugly (and dangerous). Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=