[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RSH Tools
- From: Chuck Wolber <chuckw quantumlinux com>
- To: rhl-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: RSH Tools
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
> I think you've hit the nail on the head with #1, I hear a lot of large
> enterprise shops tell me "the documented standard says rsh || the
> application vendor told me i had to have rsh", and all the technical
> documentation in the world can't change their minds. I usually make them
> aware of the security implications of plaintext transmissions, and let
> them play with their toys.
To add to your comment, if you actually do convince them that trading keys
between machines and using rsh->ssh, you're the first one them blame when
something goes wrong. Quite frankly that sucks.
What is RedHat's customer experience when they have done stuff like
"masquerade" one app as another? IOW: Add a little code so that ssh is
aware of $0 and acts accordingly. At least that could start forcing the
migration path.
-Chuck
--
Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
* Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
* Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com
* Support | chuckw quantumlinux com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]