[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Interesting article on boot ordering
- From: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
- To: rhl-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Interesting article on boot ordering
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:39:06 -0400
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 17:24, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> bwheadley earthlink net ("Bryan W. Headley") writes:
>
> >> There are existing better methods like minit[1] or runit[2] which
> >> are implementing dependencies also, which are having very fast
> >> startup/shutdown times and which are restarting died processes
> >> automatically.
> >
> > Is there anything which understands init levels in minit?
>
> It is not called 'init level' there, but there exists a similar mechanism.
How would one handle LSB compliance then?
>
>
> > E.g., one level runs X, another doesn't?
>
> minit uses argv[1] or 'default' as startup-service. So you can
> create e.g. a 'default-X' service and use the kernel-cmdline
>
> | kernel ... init=/sbin/minit default-X
>
>
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
> --
> Rhl-devel-list mailing list
> Rhl-devel-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-devel-list
--
Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>
AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]