[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Implicit/minimum buildrequires
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: rhl-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Implicit/minimum buildrequires
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:49:51 -0400
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 07:03, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> I was wondering if there was any policy doc on BuildRequires for Red Hat
> rpms, I've been playing with mach and severn srpms from fedora CVS and
> due to the very minimal nature of the mach environment I get missing
> BuildRequires.
>
> I'm aware of the policy for fedora which seems slightly stricter than
> that for Red Hat rpms.
>
> Is there a document or guide for the minimal build environment for
> building Red Hat rpms, or should missing BuildRequires go straight to
> bugzilla.
Generally, the policy is that all BuildRequires should be there. So,
feel free to Bugzilla anything you find missing. Well, within reason ...
maybe not BuildRequires: /bin/sh.
Regards,
Owen
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]