On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 03:57, Peter Bowen wrote:
> First, I would encourage you, and anyone else doing something like this
> to strongly consider doing 'rpm -qf --qf "%{VERSION}"
> /etc/redhat-release', as checking for the redhat-release package will
> fail on RHEL.
I wish we could settle on a standard /etc/release that would encode
these things in a shell-friendly manner, like /etc/lsb-release does.
Wil
--
Wil Cooley wcooley nakedape cc
Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc
* * * * Linux, UNIX, Networking and Security Solutions * * * *
* Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc *
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part