[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
- From: Dan Burcaw <dburcaw terrasoftsolutions com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:19:07 -0700
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 22:18, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:03, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 01:15, Shahms King wrote:
> >
> > > > /media - all the removable media and silliness there.
> > >
> > > And why isn't /mnt adequate for removable media?
> >
> > I don't think /mnt has anything wrong with it, but FHS specifies that
> > /media is a better name for a removable device and indeed, /media is
> > what SuSE uses.
>
> If SuSe decides to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge, are we expected to
> blindly follow?
Is SuSE doing something reason not to do it in Fedora/RHEL, etc?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]