[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
- From: Aaron Matteson <fedora-devel cryptosystem us>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 23:45:46 -0800
Dan Burcaw became daring and sent these 0.7K bytes,
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 22:18, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:03, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 01:15, Shahms King wrote:
> > >
> > > > > /media - all the removable media and silliness there.
> > > >
> > > > And why isn't /mnt adequate for removable media?
> > >
> > > I don't think /mnt has anything wrong with it, but FHS specifies that
> > > /media is a better name for a removable device and indeed, /media is
> > > what SuSE uses.
> >
> > If SuSe decides to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge, are we expected to
> > blindly follow?
>
> Is SuSE doing something reason not to do it in Fedora/RHEL, etc?
Now, in english please?
--
0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - 0xD144B7FF
0 0 1 CCNA
1 1 1 Windows/Linux C++/C# Developer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The engineer in neither optimist nor pessimist. He sees the proverbial
half-full/empty glass and says, "The glass is twice as big as there is
and need for it to be."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://cryptosystem.us/ - Project
http://cryptosystem.us/blog/ - Blog
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]