[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3



On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 08:19, Dan Burcaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 22:18, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:03, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 01:15, Shahms King wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > /media - all the removable media and silliness there.
> > > > 
> > > > And why isn't /mnt adequate for removable media?
> > > 
> > > I don't think /mnt has anything wrong with it, but FHS specifies that
> > > /media is a better name for a removable device and indeed, /media is
> > > what SuSE uses.
> > 
> > If SuSe decides to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge, are we expected to
> > blindly follow?
> 
> Is SuSE doing something reason not to do it in Fedora/RHEL, etc?

No, it isn't really, though we have some umm reservations on device
naming, file system naming related stuff when it comes from Nuremberg
;-).

/media being used by SuSE is not a reason to do it nor to not do it. So
it would be best to leave "SuSE does/doesn't do this that way" aside as
an argument.

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp redhat com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]