[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: rawhide report: 20040331 changes
- From: "Fred New" <Fred New microlink ee>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: rawhide report: 20040331 changes
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:28:46 +0300
2. aprill 2004. a. 15:22 kirjutas Tim Waugh
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
> Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20040331 changes
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:30:15AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 11:07, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > > A word of warning: the version number of the policy file has
changed
> > > in the kernel but some userland bits aren't in sync with it,
causing
> > > file context labelling not to get done. Fresh installs are likely
to
> > > fail.
> >
> > What userland bits caused a problem, so that we can avoid similar
> > problems in the future?
>
> The script that builds the install image -- it had hard-coded
> 'policy.15' as one of the files to install, so we weren't actually
> getting any policy loaded at all.
>
> I've fixed this in CVS, but until anaconda is rebuilt you can make an
> RHupdates directory (next to Fedora/ and images/) and put a policy.16
> file, which you can get from rpm2cpio'ing the policy package, in that.
>
> Tim.
> */
>
Would this be why we are getting "/home/<username>" doesn't exist
messages (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119597)?
So far, we've found that fixfiles relabel hasn't fixed anything.
Fred
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]