[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: fedora-startqa



On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 12:49, Erik LaBianca wrote:
> My personal opinion is that there shouldn't be a PUBLISH++ in the review template that is automatically output unless we are automatically doing ALL showstopper checks correctly, and the package passes. Currently we can't automate name checking, installation / uninstallation, or complete source checking, so we shouldn't print it out.
> 
If this is votable I +1 :-)  Make the reviewer do it because they have
to go through the TODO list anyhow.

[snip]

> My preference is for the review template to have a series of "blanks" to be filled in by the reviewer. A script like qa-assistant could take the output of our automated program and provide hand-holding for the user through filling in the rest of the items.
> 
> I prefer to have a series of lines like this:
> Builds OK?:		YES (fc1,rh9) NO(rh8)
> Name OK?:         unchecked
> (Un)Installs OK?: unchecked
> Secure?:          unchecked
> 
Hmmm... After I define a save format for qa-assistant, I may approach
you with a --xml-output patch.

-Toshio
-- 
_______S________U________B________L________I________M________E_______
  t  o  s  h  i  o  +  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                          GA->ME 1999

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]