[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Dependency hell
- From: Warren Togami <warren togami com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Dependency hell
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 17:09:38 -1000
Richard Hally wrote:
Please see the list of my attempts to update my system to rawhide.
The thing that seems most incorrect is that rpm or yum do not report
correctly the packages that need to be excluded. Since there always
seems to be some dependency problem (one gets fixed but another one
stops the update) it would seem that a reliable way to determine which
packages to exclude would be very helpful and save time that can be put
to better use. thanks for any help,
Richard Hally
1) Development and test releases never were supported and there is never
the expectation that upgrades will go smoothly all the time. We try our
best to prevent breakage whenever possible, but these things inevitably
periodically happen when you have dozens of developers working on many
interlocking pieces of the puzzle. We are working on improving the
standard processes to avoid more of these issues in the future, but
eliminating it completely may never happen.
2) apt-get upgrade (but not dist-upgrade) avoids the missing pieces
automatically. All the way through FC2 test1 to current rawhide it has
worked for me in not leaving a broken system. The current selinux
policy problem needs to be solved though. Panu have you communicated
with the selinux people about this?
Warren
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]