[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3

From: "Paul Rigor" <pryce ucla edu>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora Core" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:13:49 -0700

Hi,

Are there plans to include other filesystems during anaconda?  How about
including reiserfs?  I've had to manually create this filesystem... it's
plug-and-chug, but tedious.

Thanks,
Paul Rigor
pryce ucla edu
Go Bruins! Go FC!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
  - From: Michael A. Peters
- Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
  - From: Jeremy Katz

References:
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Chris Kloiber
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Dan Burcaw
- Re: Future: fhs 2.3 compliance for fc3
  - From: Aaron Matteson
- Fedora test 2: SELinux is problematic
  - From: Paul Rigor
- Re: Fedora test 2: SELinux is problematic
  - From: Paul Rigor

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]