[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Package Naming Guidlines
- From: Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Package Naming Guidlines
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:06:11 -0500
Toshio wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 11:30, Rex Dieter wrote:
Toshio wrote:
_Guidelines:
* I don't like the period between release tag and %{disttag} because it
doesn't really serve its purpose as a separator (The period gets lost in
the clutter of other periods before and after it.)
I think a better justification (other than "I don't like it") must be
made for this (or any other) change. It's in production now. It works.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Sorry I wasn't clear. This is speaking to Warren's Proposal for Fedora
Extras which isn't in production yet.
And what I am saying is that fedora.us *is* in production now, and it's
existing scheme works, and works well, IMO. Further, again, IMO, any
changes to the existing disttag scheme requires more justification than
what you've provided so far.
-- Rex
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]