Package Naming Guidlines

[Toshio]

Err... anvil's posting is the true correction of my error :-)

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 13:14, Toshio wrote:
> Oops.  My bad.  In my hypothetical the release should go from 1.s.rh9 to
> 2.rh9.  So I don't know what Warren's reason for the proposed change is.
> 
> -Toshio
-- 
_______S________U________B________L________I________M________E_______
  t  o  s  h  i  o  +  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                          GA->ME 1999