Package Naming Guidlines
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Thu Apr 8 18:17:52 UTC 2004
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:10:35 -0400, Toshio wrote:
> Things could break with strange enough upstream alphabetic release tags:
> Betas of 1.0 taking the form 1.0[a-z] will break on upgrade from 1.0s =>
> final (foo-1.0-1.s.rh9 => foobar-1.0-1.rh9) Don't knwo if that's enough
> of a reason, though.
That would be: foo-1.0-0.fdr.0.X.s.rh9 => foo-1.0-0.fdr.X.rh9
0.fdr.0.X.whatever for pre-release versions
0.fdr.X.whatever for post-release versions
> Note: If you are building packages for fedora.us, you should not
> manually add a %{disttag} to the spec files.
Actually there's a difference between adding a macro like %{disttag}
which would be undefined by default and could be set like
rpmbuild --rebuild --define "disttag .rh80" foo.src.rpm
and hard-coding a disttag in the "Release:" field. ;o)
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list