Re: Package Naming Guidlines

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Enrico Scholz wrote:

> A yet more aggressive proposal would be
>
> | %{!?releasefunc:%define releasefunc() 0.fdr.%1}
> | Release: %releasefunc XYZ
...
> Drawbacks of this variant are the additional '%{!...}' line, and that is
> does not work on RH <=8.0. But RH 8.0 is dead and packages in legacy are
> limited so that manual specfile editing should not be a problem.

FYI, I've used this type of thing a bunch myself going all the way back 
to rh73.  How exactly have you found it not to work?

-- Rex