OpenOffice.org Dictionaries

M. Fioretti m.fioretti at inwind.it
Sat Apr 10 12:33:04 UTC 2004


On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 15:11:49 PM +0300, Razvan Corneliu C.R. d3vi1 VILT (razvan.vilt at linux360.ro) wrote:
> > Please no, keep them separated. In addition to the reason you mention,
> > saving space on disk is never a bad idea.
> > 
> He meant Source RPM as in .src.rpm or .srpm
> Just like for other packages the binaries can be split. kernel is also
> only one __SOURCE__ package but multiple binaries
> (i386/i586/i686/docs/source)
> 
> Haveing a single source package is a better sollution because you can
> have a consistent way of patching things, and only one spec file.
> 
> My vote goes for "1 source package" and "1 binary package for each
> language".

Agreed 100%. I was referring only to .rpm for end users interested in
only one language.

Ciao,
	Marco Fioretti

-- 
Marco Fioretti                 m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory         http://www.rule-project.org/en/

Preserve the old, but know the new.





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list