[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RFC: fedora.us QA approval format



On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:22:37 -0400, Peter Linnell wrote:

> I know that bugzilla has the 80 charachter limit and have been a
> victimized more than once.

There is no requirement for the clearsigned part of an approval to contain
everything. It is enough when the clearsigned part contains the full
package file name and MD5 digest and a reviewer's PUBLISH judgement. Other
details of a review or approval need not be clearsigned.

Other reviews (e.g. negative ones which lead to NEEDSWORK) or ordinary
comments on a package request need not be clearsigned at all.

[...]

It is also appreciated if users of extra packages -- in addition to those
who review packages -- browse the update requests queue

  http://tinyurl.com/3at2t

and comment on any newer versions which would break something for them.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]