[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
- From: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn pobox com>
- To: russell coker com au, Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- Subject: Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:13:53 -0700
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:49:18PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
[quote reformatted to reduce width]
> The only thing to note with XFS is that it's strongly recommended
> that you use a 512 byte block size.
Where did you find that recommendation?
The closest thing I've found to an XFS block size recommendation is
this, which generally suggests 4K blocks for filesystems greater than
100MB in size:
http://www.cray.com/craydoc/manuals/S-2377-22/html-S-2377-22/z1029460436.html
Also, the default block size is 4K.
-Barry K. Nathan <barryn pobox com>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]