[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
- From: Russell Coker <russell coker com au>
- To: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn pobox com>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>, Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- Subject: Re: ReiserFS(v3,v4) vs. Ext3
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:09:26 +1000
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 04:13, "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn pobox com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:49:18PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> [quote reformatted to reduce width]
>
> > The only thing to note with XFS is that it's strongly recommended
> > that you use a 512 byte block size.
>
> Where did you find that recommendation?
Sorry that was a mistake. I meant to say a "512 byte Inode size".
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]