[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: redhat-menus and redhat-lsb fixes
- From: "Razvan Corneliu C.R. \"d3vi1\" VILT" <razvan vilt linux360 ro>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: redhat-menus and redhat-lsb fixes
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:43:05 +0300
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 14:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> Seth Nickell argues:
>
> "Stuff shouldn't be in More... if people go out of their way to install
> other software, they most likely want that item to show up in the normal
> menus, not under More. Furthermore, if people do Everything installs,
> they asked for it and their menus are going to be cluttered."
>
> Dan
>
>
All respect for seth, but I have a multi user desktop. My mother needs
some applications, my dad others, my bro games, and I need some also.
Evolution is the only one we all need, that's why we installed so many
packages (all of them to be honest, as I am doing some work on an
adaptation of fedora to our school's needs). And if this example is not
enough, try having a high-school, different students require different
applications, the common ones should have X-Red-Hat-Base, others should
be in more. I also saw that fedora.us has X-Fedora-Base, that should be
also included in the base stuff.
What about the redhat-lsb package? Was the patch submitted?
Then again, this is just my personal opinion, no other persons reacted
to this thread, so I guess nobody else is bothered by this.
Best Regards,
--
Razvan Corneliu C.R. "d3vi1" VILT <razvan vilt linux360 ro>
Digital Vision - linux360 - Vision Project Maintainer
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]