Re: AFS and Fedora and the 2.6 kernel

[Stephen Smoogen <smoogen lanl gov>]

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Matthew Miller wrote:

>
>> If you cannot do that, well, that's tough.
>
>Well, it _is_ tough, but I'm surprised that we're the only place that seems
>to have real interest.
>
>
>> To stick to RHEL 3 and OpenAFS would probably your best bet.
>
>Does RHEL plan to stick with the 2.4 kernel forever?
>

I figure RHEL-2/3 will always be 2.4.x. RHEL-4 is probably going to be 
2.6.x... that probably tells you where AFS support will be in it.


-- 
Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen lanl gov
Los Alamos National Lab  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem --