callgrind and graphviz
Colin Walters
walters at redhat.com
Tue Aug 31 13:57:25 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 00:39 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > The kdesdk rpm includes kcachegrind, but callgrind and graphviz are not
> > in FC3, callgrind is the actual calltree generating backend for
> > kcachegrind, while graphviz is used to draw the pretty calltree
> > diagrams.
> >
> > Are there existing reasons why they are not in FC ? oversights or is
> > there licence issues, esp with graphviz ?
> >
> > C.
>
> Don't know answers to your questions, but if graphviz has license/legal
> issues then we should remove it from Extras.
Debian has classified it as non-free for a long time. See:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphics/graphviz.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/02/msg00399.html
I had thought there was more discussion about the graphviz license on
debian-legal but couldn't find it in a few seconds of searching.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20040831/5b0e252c/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list