[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE

From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:03:15 +0200

On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 17:26, Alan Cox wrote:

> Or reopen/file a new bug when it does become important.
bugzilla.redhat.com doesn't allow external (non-redhat.com) reporters to
reopen such PRs.

All one could do is to comment on a PR and politely ask the package
maintainer to look into a the PR again, hoping he will listen :-/

Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
  - From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
  - From: Mark McLoughlin

References:
- Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
  - From: Florian La Roche
- Re: Fedora Extras vs. CLOSED RAWHIDE
  - From: Alan Cox

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]