[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: latest kudzu changes
- From: Jesse Keating <jkeating j2solutions net>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: latest kudzu changes
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:55:56 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 06:33, Stephen J Smoogen wrote:
> No but it does make bootstrapping and starting an auditing process
> easier. And while it may be more of a RHEL type item.. there may be a
> need for an 'OpenFedora' style sub-project to help kickstart it for
> organizations that need to have all source code internally verified
> before being put into production. These projects usually have to build
> up to the entire distro, and un-needed buildrequires cause issues with
> that being possible. [There are likely groups that are only 1/2 of the
> way through RHEL-3 having to do it with every RPM.]
Or a more practical example would be the porting of Fedora to other archs
such as PPC and Alpha and whatever else.
- --
Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBIhx84v2HLvE71NURAqPAAJwMPNjhIWxEQqeh8l/B6UaBQscrDQCglCS+
7gEgxs4hJbx72PtKXxjokIM=
=Dixk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]