[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: LVM snapshot
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net>
- Cc: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: LVM snapshot
- Date: 18 Aug 2004 17:01:14 -0300
On Aug 18, 2004, Chris Adams <cmadams hiwaay net> wrote:
> For the same reason, I'd suggest dm-snapshot also be unconditionally
> included. I use snapshots to get consistent backups; if the system were
> rebooted during backup (while the snapshot of / exists), I guess
> dm-snapshot is required, right?
Maybe not. Since it's a separate LV, it's perfectly possible that, if
dm-snapshot is not available in the initrd vgscan, you won't get that
LV active, but will for the rest; later on, after the root fs is
mounted read-write, vgscan runs again, and the module is available, so
you get the snapshot volume up and running.
This is unlike dm-mirror (assuming pvmove actually uses it), since it
modifies existing volumes (e.g., the one holding the rootfs), you may
need dm-mirror early in order to boot up.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]