[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: upgrade to rawhide report
- From: Dax Kelson <dax gurulabs com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: upgrade to rawhide report
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:50:28 -0600
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 05:56, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 12:48, Alan Cox wrote:
> > The problem with that view (which indeed was certainly my view and I fixed
> > some drivers) is that from "up" it can take 60 seconds to get gigabit
> > negotiation completed. In addition it really mucks up power management
> > code in all the drivers.
>
> I have a set of IBM servers with E1000 type ethernet NICs onboard which
> are incapable of DHCP because they take longer to negotiate onto the
> network than the DHCP timeouts. More amusingly, if coupled with cisco
> switches they can badly negotiate to a state where ping and packet
> turn-round time is of the order of 10 seconds. Where the hell it stores
> the data I have no idea...
It isn't just NIC to switch negotiation.
What I've seen in many many environments is the spanning tree protocol
is-there-a-layer-2-loop detection taking longer than the DHCP client
will wait.
I wager that spanning tree is the bigger problem vs ethernet
negotiation.
Dax Kelson
Guru Labs
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]