With udev, are dev and MAKEDEV still required?

Alan Cox alan at redhat.com
Sat Aug 28 10:40:22 UTC 2004


On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:57:55AM +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> A problem with MAKEDEV is, that it places the MAKEDEV *binary* into
> /dev. This is a really bad place for it; devfs under 2.4 removed it and
> buildsystems which need a special /dev will remove it also.

Unix tradition is the essential reason for this. Nothing more.





More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list