Kudzu and automatic detection
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Tue Dec 7 09:07:57 UTC 2004
Matthew E. Lauterbach wrote:
> On Monday, December 06, 2004 4:26 PM -0600, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>>Le lundi 06 décembre 2004 à 15:59 -0600, Matthew E. Lauterbach a écrit :
>>
>>>On Monday, December 06, 2004 11:42 AM, Simarjeet Sahni wrote:
>>>
>>>>I agree, the device should be unavailabe if it has been removed,
>>>>however, its related user configured properties should not.
>>>
>>>What if it is actually gone, never to return?
>>>How can we tell the difference?
>>
>>Is this really a problem given today's storage sizes ? This message will
>>be heavier than most device property files. We are talking about a very
>>small set of critical tunings
>>
>
> It's a very small problem. I think that if you can determine that it isn't
> coming back you should clean up after it. I agree that if the device will
> return or if you can't tell the difference it would be better to keep the
> user configuration.
>
>
>
Well,
AFAIK this one is easy, just keep a timestamp when the device was last
seen and nuke it if it hasn't been used for a year.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list